In this post, I pointed out that the press refuses to accurately describe the movers and shakers behind the "anti-war" movement. Here is how the New York Times describes them:

The protests here and elsewhere were largely sponsored by two groups, the Answer Coalition, which embodies a wide range of progressive political objectives, and United for Peace and Justice, which has a more narrow, antiwar focus.

And the Washington Post:

In Washington, the events were sponsored by groups including the ANSWER Coalition and United for Peace and Justice and focused on a succinct theme: "End the War in Iraq and Bring the Troops Home Now."

REMINDER! This is the ANSWER Coalition:

International ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism) is a front group for the communist Workers World Party. The Workers World Party is, literally, a Stalinist organization.
[...]

International ANSWER today unquestioningly supports any despotic regime that lays any claim to socialism, or simply to anti-Americanism.

That's right, these protests have been largely sponsored by Communists. If it is the mission of the press to report the truth, the two most influential newspapers in this country are, to use trendy term, criminally negligent.